Search results

Looking at the facts...my take is the opposite of what you suggest.

I believe some can be paid up front. Barber has mentioned in a pod cast that transfer fees can be dependent on the structure of the deal i.e. cheaper if paid in one go, more expensive if paid over time.

Stuttgart would be nuts not to activate the buy out given their current situation.

We didn’t “casually toss aside a striker”, we loaned a player who, for whatever reason, seemed to want to return to his home country. He wasn’t shipped out as a failure.

And was very composed when finishing, something Maupay never was. For example I remember those two cute chips he scored from.

Also, it will be quite amazing to add a couple of Euro 2024 winners medals to our WC and AFCON gongs.

I know there were some personal reasons which affected things. My point was not questioning his ability, more the fact that things were not going well for him both on and off the pitch but now he’s flying and seemingly happy. I like the guy and am pleased for him.

Fair comment.

The CL is a good payer so they will have some extra euros now.

Bit part Brighton player to German international and CL qualifier is some turn around.

I presume the price is in the loan contract.

Have to agree. CL football in his home country is a strong lure.

That article doesn’t make sense to me. How did the cancellation clause protect Rangers from a rising fee? If they didn’t want to pay this they simply return the player.

Not really “On the other side of it, Bundesliga clubs signed a total of 270 new players in the summer of 2023. The transfer expenditures for these acquisitions amounted to $748 million. This means that, on average, clubs invested approximately $41 million per club in new players.”...